Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 2023 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2319201

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hypercoagulable state contributing to thrombotic complications worsens COVID-19 severity and outcomes, while anticoagulation improves outcomes by alleviating hypercoagulability. OBJECTIVES: Examine whether hemophilia, an inherent hypocoagulable condition, offers protection against COVID-19 severity and reduces VTE risk in persons with hemophilia (PwH). PATIENTS/METHODS: A 1: 3 propensity score (PS) matched retrospective cohort study used national COVID-19 registry data (January 2020 through January 2022) to compare outcomes between 300 male PwH and 900 matched controls without hemophilia. RESULTS: Analyses of PwH demonstrated known risk-factors (older age, heart failure, hypertension, cancer/malignancy, dementia, renal and liver disease) contributed to severe COVID-19 and/or 30-day-all-cause mortality. Non-CNS bleeding was an additional risk-factor for poor outcomes in PwH. Odds of developing VTE with COVID-19 in PwH were associated with pre-COVID VTE diagnosis (OR 51.9, 95% CI 12.8-266, p<0.001), anticoagulation therapy (OR 12.7, 95% CI 3.01-48.6, p<0.001) and pulmonary disease (OR 16.1, 95% CI 10.4-25.4, p<0.001). Thirty-day-all-cause-mortality (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.75-2.11, p=0.3), and VTE events (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.64-2.73, p=0.4) were not significantly different between matched cohorts; however, hospitalizations (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20-2.10, p 0.001) and non-CNS bleeding events (OR 4.78, 95% CI 2.98-7.48, p<0.001) were increased in PwH. In multivariate analyses, hemophilia did not reduce adverse outcomes (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.74-2.31, p 0.2) nor VTE (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.44-2.67, p 0.8) but increased bleeding risk (OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.98-7.48, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: After adjusting for patient characteristics/comorbidities, hemophilia increased bleeding risk with COVID-19 but did not protect against severe disease and VTE.

2.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 6(5): e12780, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2280185

ABSTRACT

Background: Limited data exist about effective regimens for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in children with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Objectives: Study the outcomes of institutional thromboprophylaxis protocol for primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in children hospitalized with acute COVID-19/MIS-C. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive children (aged less than 21 years) with COVID-19/MIS-C who received tailored intensity thromboprophylaxis, primarily with low-molecular-weight heparin, from April 2020 through October 2021. Thromboprophylaxis was given to those with moderate to severe disease based on the World Health Organization scale and exposure to two or more VTE risk factors. Therapeutic intensity was considered for severe illness. Clinical recovery along with D-dimer improvement determined thromboprophylaxis duration. Outcomes were incident VTEs, bleeding, and mortality. Results: Among 211 hospitalizations, 45 (21.3%) received thromboprophylaxis (COVID-19, 16; MIS-C, 29). Median age was 14.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.9-16.1). Among 35 (77.8%) with severe illness, 27 (60.0%) required respiratory support, and 19 (42.2%) required an intensive care unit stay. Median hospitalization was 6 days (IQR, 5.0-10.5). Median thromboprophylaxis duration was 19 days (IQR, 6.0-31.0) with therapeutic intensity in 24 (53.3%) and prophylactic in 21 (46.7%). Outcomes were as follows: VTE, 1 (2.2%); death, 1 (2.2%, unrelated to bleeding/thrombosis); major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, 0; and minor bleeding, 7 (15.5%). D-dimer was elevated in a majority at diagnosis (median, 2.3; IQR, 1.2-3.3 mg/ml fibrinogen-equivalent units) and was noninformative in assessing disease severity. D-dimer normalized at thromboprophylaxis discontinuation. Conclusions: Our experience of using clinically directed thromboprophylaxis with tailored intensity approach for children hospitalized with COVID-19 and MIS-C favors its inclusion in current standard of care. The role of D-dimer in directing thromboprophylaxis management deserves further evaluation.

3.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol ; 2(1): e188, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2132871

ABSTRACT

We describe the association between job roles and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare personnel. A wide range of hazard ratios were observed across job roles. Medical assistants had higher hazard ratios than nurses, while attending physicians, food service workers, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, residents and fellows, and temporary workers had lower hazard ratios.

4.
Hosp Pediatr ; 12(7): e261-e265, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1923745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: N-terminal of probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are often elevated in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) secondary to inflammation, myocardial dysfunction, or increased wall tension. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), accepted treatment of MIS-C, may transiently increase myocardial tension and contribute to an increase in NT-proBNP. We sought to study the association between pre- and post-IVIG levels of NT-proBNP and CRP and their clinical significance. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included consecutive children, aged ≤21 years, with diagnosis of MIS-C who received IVIG from April 2020 to October 2021. Data collection included clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, management, and outcomes. Study cohort consisted of patients who received IVIG and had NT-proBNP levels available pre- and post-IVIG. RESULTS: Among 35 patients with MIS-C, 30 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four, 80%, showed elevation in NT-proBNP post-IVIG. The median NT-proBNP level pre-IVIG was 1921 pg/mL (interquartile range 548-3956), significantly lower than the post-IVIG median of 3756 pg/mL (interquartile range 1342-7634)) (P = .0010). The median pre-IVIG CRP level was significantly higher than the post-IVIG level (12 mg/dL vs 8 mg/dL, P = .0006). All but 1 recovered before discharge, and none had signs of worsening cardiac function post-IVIG. In those who recovered, NT-proBNP had normalized by discharge or 1-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that NT-proBNP levels often transiently increase immediately after IVIG therapy without signs of worsening myocardial function. These values should be interpreted in the context of CRP levels and clinical recovery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , Child , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments , Retrospective Studies , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL